Criteria for Slaughters

Ok so, I've gone a bit geeky and quantified my judging process. Hopefully, these criteria will help break down the strengths and weakness of a film, as well as the individual cogs that come together to make great (or not-so-great) cinema. In advance, I am sorry.

Criteria #1 - Innovation
By innovation, I mean how much have the various cogs (acting, writing, directing, sound, etc) contained within the movie pushed the envelop? Did they take the medium by the horns and wrench it around into something new, or did they plug the numbers into an equation and spit out something we've all seen 1000 times before? On a scale of 1 to 5...

1 - There is nothing new about this. This film/soundtrack/script/etc was made with stupid, ugly cookie cutters.
2 - There isn't much new about this, but there's a lot of razzmatazz to cover that up - like cookie cutters shaped like ninjas!
3 - There are nifty bits.
4 - Oh my god, how did we ever design action sequences/write dialog/etc without this amazing new thing! Quick, everyone - let's copy it before it's old and boring!
5 - Our souls has been ruined for life, since we will never again experience anything so sublimely innovative.

Criteria #2 - Emotional Content
How does it make you feel? No, seriously. Just because a movie makes you well up with tears doesn't mean its any good, but it still made you cry so that's worth something, right? It's a fine line between beating your audience over the head with emotional cues, and making your movie flatter then a raccoon on the 401. On a scale of 1 to 5...

1 - This is so over-the-top/ineffective that we've vomited over EVERYTHING.
2 - This is pretty bad, but at least we only puked a little in our mouths.
3 - This is completely unbelievable, but its all so much fun that we'll ignore that for now.
4 - Yeah, alright, fine, you got our eyes leaking/stomach flopping/heart swelling... Congratu-fucking-lations.
5 - We have connected so deeply with the emotional content of this film that our hearts have exploded.

Criteria #3 - Cohesiveness
This is a good indication of directorial skills and post-production teamwork (or lack there of). Does the end of the movie relate back to the beginning of the film, or did some Deus Ex Machina drop in and solve every last conflict? Does the movie get all bi-polar and switch between slapstick and melodrama? Is there redundant voice-over that disappears 15 minutes in? A movie that yo-yos all over the place is not to be trusted, even though individual bits may be really good. On a scale of 1 to 5...

1 - See picture move people talk movie bad.
2 - Who needs structure when you've got SNAZZ (in this case, snazz can be one or more of the following: guns, explosions, sex, women in lingerie, men with waxed abs, flashing lights, bright colours.)
3 - This film is coherent enough, but we still don't give a shit about it.
4 - Most of the bits are quite clever, and they cover up the not-so-clever bits.
5 - All the bits fits together so perfectly that its overloaded our brains, and they have melted.